<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dr. Film’s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog</link>
	<description>Musings on classic films...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:51:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “The History Not Found in Books” by drfilm</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=447#comment-6493</link>
		<dc:creator>drfilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=447#comment-6493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re most welcome, Suzanne.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re most welcome, Suzanne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “The History Not Found in Books” by Suzanne Stanis</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=447#comment-6492</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Stanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=447#comment-6492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for mentioning the Henry Glassie lecture in your blog and for supporting Indiana Landmarks!   Althought I&#039;m not sure if it will tie as nicely to film, I think Nancy Hiller&#039;s talk this Thursday will be equally inspiring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning the Henry Glassie lecture in your blog and for supporting Indiana Landmarks!   Althought I&#8217;m not sure if it will tie as nicely to film, I think Nancy Hiller&#8217;s talk this Thursday will be equally inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday, Lon Chaney!  London After Midnight Found at Last! by L. F. Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=419#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator>L. F. Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=419#comment-5634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that Big Foot has the last remaining copy of &quot;London After Midnight.&quot; Good luck prying those reels from a yeti&#039;s hands!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that Big Foot has the last remaining copy of &#8220;London After Midnight.&#8221; Good luck prying those reels from a yeti&#8217;s hands!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A First Time For Everything by Vanessa Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=413#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=413#comment-5507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on being a guest. Loved Night Of The Hunter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on being a guest. Loved Night Of The Hunter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A First Time For Everything by Glory-June Greiff</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=413#comment-5317</link>
		<dc:creator>Glory-June Greiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=413#comment-5317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen &quot;Night of the Hunter&quot; only once, and it gave me nightmares!  The nightmares have faded, but not the memory of the shimmering, dreamlike photography.  Gorgeous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;Night of the Hunter&#8221; only once, and it gave me nightmares!  The nightmares have faded, but not the memory of the shimmering, dreamlike photography.  Gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Free or Not to Free?  That is the Question by Glory-June Greiff</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=404#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Glory-June Greiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=404#comment-5284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much,much food for thought here, indeed.  Wish the path to an answer was not so devious!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much,much food for thought here, indeed.  Wish the path to an answer was not so devious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2001: A Sideways Odyssey by Bruce Lawton</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lawton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two other recent, remarkable films came to mind as I read this excellent assessment.

The first is MOON (2009) starring Sam Rockwell and directed by Duncan Jones (son of David Bowie). This film clearly owes much to Kubrick&#039;s classic and some obvious references and inspirations. However, MOON is quite a unique piece of sci-fi as I&#039;ve ever seen, with adroit storytelling, a superb performance by Rockwell and almost entirely organic, non-CGI effects that truly make you feel as if you&#039;re watching documentary footage in space, which evokes profound feelings of  isolation and loneliness.

And love or hate Terrence Malick&#039;s THE TREE OF LIFE (2011) one certainly cannot fault maestro Douglas Trumbull&#039;s mesmerizing work on the film.  Malick brought him on board because of his dislike of the look of CGI, upon which Trumbull responded, &quot;Why not do it the way we did it on 2001?&quot; Why not indeed! What a visual feast!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two other recent, remarkable films came to mind as I read this excellent assessment.</p>
<p>The first is MOON (2009) starring Sam Rockwell and directed by Duncan Jones (son of David Bowie). This film clearly owes much to Kubrick&#8217;s classic and some obvious references and inspirations. However, MOON is quite a unique piece of sci-fi as I&#8217;ve ever seen, with adroit storytelling, a superb performance by Rockwell and almost entirely organic, non-CGI effects that truly make you feel as if you&#8217;re watching documentary footage in space, which evokes profound feelings of  isolation and loneliness.</p>
<p>And love or hate Terrence Malick&#8217;s THE TREE OF LIFE (2011) one certainly cannot fault maestro Douglas Trumbull&#8217;s mesmerizing work on the film.  Malick brought him on board because of his dislike of the look of CGI, upon which Trumbull responded, &#8220;Why not do it the way we did it on 2001?&#8221; Why not indeed! What a visual feast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2001: A Sideways Odyssey by drfilm</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>drfilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a path well-trodden in books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a path well-trodden in books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2001: A Sideways Odyssey by Glory-June Greiff</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Glory-June Greiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael, that&#039;s an interesting perspective.  Certainly Hal is whining, despite the monotone.
I like this blog for its historic perspective.  Could be the core for a much larger article or even a book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, that&#8217;s an interesting perspective.  Certainly Hal is whining, despite the monotone.<br />
I like this blog for its historic perspective.  Could be the core for a much larger article or even a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2001: A Sideways Odyssey by Mike Gebert</title>
		<link>http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drfilm.net/blog/?p=392#comment-5243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although 2001 is such a non-verbal experience, if you&#039;re able to look at it analytically it&#039;s remarkably efficient in making its points (at least till the trip). Every shot in the dawn of man sequence establishes a fact about what we&#039;re seeing-- the apes are no better than tapirs at feeding themselves, the apes are vulnerable to predators, they spar but cannot fight with their fellows, then the monolith appears... it&#039;s so neatly laid out, yet people still insist it&#039;s just self-indulgent visual wow.  Kubrick was an efficient B movie maker at heart... then. (But even later, The Shining is pretty much as precise at setting the terms of its tale and putting the chess pieces in place.)

I&#039;d love to see a clip of Hal with Martin Balsam&#039;s voice. I&#039;m convinced that the dialogues with Hal are basically inspired by Nichols and May&#039;s routines, but using someone so New York Jewish made the passive-aggressive neurotic humor too obvious. Douglas Rain took the deadpan comedy down to absolute zero, which works brilliantly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although 2001 is such a non-verbal experience, if you&#8217;re able to look at it analytically it&#8217;s remarkably efficient in making its points (at least till the trip). Every shot in the dawn of man sequence establishes a fact about what we&#8217;re seeing&#8211; the apes are no better than tapirs at feeding themselves, the apes are vulnerable to predators, they spar but cannot fight with their fellows, then the monolith appears&#8230; it&#8217;s so neatly laid out, yet people still insist it&#8217;s just self-indulgent visual wow.  Kubrick was an efficient B movie maker at heart&#8230; then. (But even later, The Shining is pretty much as precise at setting the terms of its tale and putting the chess pieces in place.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a clip of Hal with Martin Balsam&#8217;s voice. I&#8217;m convinced that the dialogues with Hal are basically inspired by Nichols and May&#8217;s routines, but using someone so New York Jewish made the passive-aggressive neurotic humor too obvious. Douglas Rain took the deadpan comedy down to absolute zero, which works brilliantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
