{"id":198,"date":"2012-03-13T15:44:20","date_gmt":"2012-03-13T19:44:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/?p=198"},"modified":"2020-12-06T21:33:02","modified_gmt":"2020-12-07T02:33:02","slug":"dude-yousawtheartist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/?p=198","title":{"rendered":"Dude, #youSawTheArtist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now that <em>The Artist <\/em>has won the Best Picture Oscar, I\u2019ve been asked by numerous people to recommend other silent films.\u00a0 People treat me as if I speak a foreign language and that perhaps I can teach them the secret to unlocking it.\u00a0 In a way, this is really true, because silent film uses a different filmic syntax, and it\u2019s one that has to be learned with repeated viewings.\u00a0 Silent film technique is <em>not <\/em>primitive&#8230; it is quite advanced, in fact, but it is fundamentally <em>different<\/em> from the techniques we use today. That\u2019s why it can seem a little silly if you are not used to it.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the people who ask me about silent films are younger folks who are just discovering silents.\u00a0 I hope this will dispel the myth that I somehow dislike younger people or \u201cnewbies,\u201d which is definitely not the case.\u00a0 The entire goal of the <em>Dr. Film <\/em>show is to be able to include films and shorts that will appeal to a broad audience, from newbies to dyed-in-the-wool film geeks.<\/p>\n<p>What I don\u2019t like, and will continue not to like, is the persistent cultural idea that there were only five films made before <em>Star Wars<\/em>, which seems to be the oldest film most people will watch.\u00a0 I refer to these as the \u201cHoly Quintet\u201d of classic films. (See the end of this article for the list of the \u201cHoly Quintet,\u201d just in case you\u2019re wondering.)<\/p>\n<p>Silent films suffer even more in popular culture, They were often copied poorly, causing them to have that blown-out over-white look, and they were often transferred at speeds that were completely incorrect.\u00a0 This only hurts the whole of silent film, because originally all the prints were lovely and they were all projected at reasonable speeds.<\/p>\n<p>Most articles that I see trot out the same few silent films, often with a dismissive swish that these are flickery and sped-up, not understanding the basic idea of what silents were about.<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019ve been reading about <em>The Artist, <\/em>then you\u2019ve seen these articles, too.\u00a0 Everyone wants you to see <em>Sunrise<\/em>, <em>Passion of Joan of Arc<\/em>, <em>City Lights<\/em>, <em>Metropolis, <\/em>and <em>Intolerance<\/em>.\u00a0 These are becoming the clich\u00e9d \u201csee these after you\u2019ve seen <em>The Artist<\/em>\u201d list.<\/p>\n<p>The problem that I have with this list is that they are not terribly accessible.\u00a0 Not in a strict sense of availability\u2013these films can all be found on video, and often downloaded.\u00a0 The problem is that these are not films I\u2019d recommend for newbies.\u00a0 It\u2019s the equivalent of handing <em>Beowulf <\/em>to a kid who\u2019s just finished <em>Green Eggs and Ham<\/em>.\u00a0 Sure, <em>Beowulf <\/em>is great, but the poor kid is probably going to be put off a lot of literature because this is just too much for him.<\/p>\n<p>All of the films in the \u201csee these after you\u2019ve seen <em>The Artist\u201d <\/em>list are films I\u2019ve seen, and one of the things that they share is that they tend to be rather broad-sweeping epics.\u00a0 They tackle big issues, they\u2019re big and ponderous, and they\u2019re \u201carty.\u201d\u00a0 There\u2019s nothing wrong with that\u2013<em>I like these pictures<\/em>\u2013but I fear that the won\u2019t play well for viewers who are new to the medium.\u00a0 Worse still, these are all films that demand a great deal of concentration and play infinitely better on a large screen with an audience.\u00a0 I\u2019ve got to face the fact that I need to hook new viewers by finding films that will play well on an iPhone. Then I slowly must convince them that the theatrical experience is far superior <em>especially for silents!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I need\u00a0 to emphasize once again that silents are fundamentally different from talkies.\u00a0 You can watch <em>Transformers 3 <\/em>and walk into the kitchen, come back, and you\u2019ve heard all the explosions and dialogue that you need to follow the story.\u00a0 We can\u2019t do that with silents.\u00a0 If you miss two or three minutes, then you may be lost.\u00a0 More importantly, there are things we can do in talkies that we can\u2019t do in silents, but there are things that we can do in silents that we can\u2019t do in talkies.<\/p>\n<p>Ben Model frequently points out (and accurately), that one of the things we can do in silents is to have large, noisy objects sneak up behind the protagonist while he is unaware of them.\u00a0 In Buster Keaton pictures, this is often a train.\u00a0 When Buster\u2019s back is to the train, even if we can see it, we\u2019re somehow able to believe that Buster can\u2019t hear it.\u00a0 We don\u2019t hear it either.\u00a0 Once he sees it, then he is aware of its existence.\u00a0 Sight is the only sense we have in a silent film.<\/p>\n<p>The other thing that many have already gleaned from me is that I tend to veer off the mainstream, so I figure that you can find all the big, epic silents you need.\u00a0 I\u2019ve prepared a list of ten silent films that I hope will encourage you to see more.<\/p>\n<p>These are not what I think are the ten best silent films.\u00a0 I hate lists like that.\u00a0 These are not my favorite silent films.\u00a0 I hate lists like that.\u00a0 These are not even what I consider a balanced overview of what silent films represented.\u00a0 I\u2019m not sure I could do that with just ten.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the criteria I used\u2013<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The film must be available in some way on video or for download.<\/li>\n<li>The film should be something that helps showcase the uniqueness of silent film.\u00a0 It should either be something difficult to make as a talkie or something that was never attempted again for other reasons.<\/li>\n<li>Big photographic epics that play well on big screens should be avoided.\u00a0 Tight comedies or dramas play better on small screens.<\/li>\n<li>Let\u2019s have some fun and pick films that most others skip over and don\u2019t mention.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The list, in random order, not by quality.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Sherlock-Jr-Three-Ages-Blu-ray\/dp\/B0041CGOZI\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648616&amp;sr=8-1\">Sherlock Junior (1924)<\/a> with Buster Keaton.\u00a0 I didn\u2019t want to pick <em>The General<\/em>, because everyone will pick it, and because it\u2019s a little too epic for new viewers.\u00a0 Still, Keaton has a special timeless quality about him that appeals across generations.\u00a0 This film is action-packed, and it contains a delightful sequence in which Keaton walks into a movie screen.\u00a0 Again, it couldn\u2019t be made as a talkie, because the \u201cfilm\u201d he walks into is bizarrely disjointed and would contain wildly disparate sounds to destroy the illusion.\u00a0 <em>Sherlock <\/em>is probably not Keaton\u2019s best film, but it is a film I think would appeal to a broad audience.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Mark-Zorro-Douglas-Fairbanks\/dp\/6305211094\/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648699&amp;sr=8-4\">The Mark of Zorro (1920)<\/a>.\u00a0 I have to include a Douglas Fairbanks title in this list in order not to feel inordinately guilty.\u00a0 <em>Thief of Baghdad <\/em>needs to be seen on a big screen, but <em>Zorro <\/em>is a blast no matter how you see it.\u00a0 I\u2019m not going to recount the Zorro legend to you, because you should already know it.\u00a0 Fairbanks plays him brilliantly.\u00a0 He was a force of nature, an unstoppable guy who seemed to embody the term \u201cirrational exuberance.\u201d\u00a0 Fairbanks was not afraid to break all the rules of filmmaking and storytelling, either.\u00a0 The last 20 minutes of so of <em>Zorro <\/em>is a non-stop chase.\u00a0 It\u2019s too long, it stops the film cold in its tracks, and it does nothing to forward the story at all.\u00a0 I loved every second of it and would never cut a single frame. Fairbanks makes it work.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Max-Davidson-Comedies-NON-USA-Germany\/dp\/B0057JHMO6\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648773&amp;sr=1-1\">Films of Max Davidson<\/a>.\u00a0 Available only as a German DVD, mostly due to rights issues and because Americans don\u2019t like the idea of Max in general, these films are gems.\u00a0 Max had his own series of short films under producer Hal Roach in the late 1920s.\u00a0 He could hardly have misfired with the help he had available: many of the shorts were directed by young comedy genius Leo McCarey and photographed by budding genius director George Stevens.\u00a0 Still, Max is one of the great comic performers, if only because he <em>reacts<\/em>so well.\u00a0 Max\u2019s reaction shots are a model of how a comic can and should stretch a funny situation for maximum laughs.One example I can give of Max\u2019s brilliance is in <em>Pass the Gravy <\/em>(1928).\u00a0 This is truly one of the funniest short films ever made by anyone at any time.\u00a0 And it basically has <em>one joke<\/em>stretched out for almost 20 minutes.\u00a0 I can even tell you the joke without giving anything away!\u00a0 Max\u2019s character is a stereotypical little Jewish guy from the 1920s, complete with beard, cheapness, etc.\u00a0 He generally has an idiot son who commits some sort of mischief.\u00a0 In this one, the son accidentally kills the neighbor\u2019s prize rooster, Brigham.\u00a0 The son then cooks it, leaving the FIRST PRIZE band highly visible on the rooster\u2019s leg.\u00a0 The family serves it up to the neighbor in hopes to mend the discord between the two families.\u00a0 Max doesn\u2019t understand what\u2019s happened, but the rest of the family does, and they desperately try to explain the problem in pantomime so that the neighbor doesn\u2019t find out.\u00a0 It\u2019s a work of genius.<em>Should Second Husbands Come First? <\/em>manages to top this in terms of sheer political incorrectness.\u00a0 Money-grubbing Max is trying to marry a rich widow, much to the dismay of her two sons.\u00a0 They concoct a scheme to break up the wedding: one son dresses up as a shamed woman, holding a young child \u201cshe\u201d claims to be Max\u2019s illegitimate son.\u00a0 The boys could only find a black baby for their shenanigans, so they powdered all the visible parts.\u00a0 Mortified at the events, Max\u2019s cheap friends quickly take back all their wedding gifts.\u00a0 The baby\u2019s pants fall off, revealing a posterior of the incorrect tone.\u00a0 The ruse is exposed, and Max demands all the presents be returned.\u00a0 Yes, folks, in the space of 45 seconds we have two Jewish jokes, a black joke, and a butt joke.Hal Roach felt these were all OK because they were not of a vicious nature and <em>everyone<\/em> was subject to the humor in these films.\u00a0 I tend to think he was right, but there are still people who think these films should be banned.\u00a0 Maybe they should be banned, but you should see them first, because they are truly hilarious.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Grass-Nations-Battle-For-Life\/dp\/6305773955\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648824&amp;sr=1-1\"><em>Grass<\/em><\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Chang-Kru\/dp\/B00004Z4VM\/ref=tmm_dvd_title_0?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648866&amp;sr=1-2\"><em>Chang<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0 These two groundbreaking documentaries are about as fascinating as movies get.\u00a0 I don\u2019t want to tell you too much about them, because they have to be seen to be believed.\u00a0 The thing to bear in mind while seeing them is that they were made by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, who later made <em>King Kong<\/em> (1933).\u00a0 You start to realize in watching these films just how much Cooper borrowed from his real-life experiences when making <em>Kong<\/em>, and you see a glimpse of native life (and wildlife) in Asia that was not captured any other way.\u00a0 There are probably more tigers killed in <em>Chang <\/em>than exist worldwide today!\u00a0 Beautiful photography, intense editing, fascinating action sequences.\u00a0 Yes, they\u2019re violent, not for young children.\u00a0 Yes, they\u2019re hoked up for maximum effect.\u00a0 That doesn\u2019t stop them from being landmark films.\u00a0 As a side note, it\u2019s important to realize that Cooper was basically the real-life (and smart) equivalent of Forrest Gump.\u00a0 Almost every major event in the 20th Century had Cooper\u2019s involvement: he was a WWI aviator, POW, anti-Communist, pioneer in the aviation industry, documentary filmmaker, studio head, major investor in Technicolor, major backer of David Selznick and John Ford, WWII hero, major investor in Cinerama, and several other things.\u00a0 Amazing films, amazing man.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Charley-Bowers-Rediscovery-American-Genius\/dp\/B00016XN2A\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648942&amp;sr=1-1\">The films of Charley Bowers<\/a>.\u00a0 I don\u2019t know what to say about this guy.\u00a0 He\u2019s unique in all of cinema.\u00a0 Was he smoking something?\u00a0 Probably.\u00a0 Bowers\u2019 blend of stop-motion and live-action was pioneering and mind-blowing.\u00a0 Sadly, most of his films were lost for many years, and many have only been rediscovered in the last decade or so.\u00a0 Bowers\u2019 comic character was sort of a combination of Chaplin and Keaton with a bizarre inventive streak thrown in.\u00a0 Bowers casually showed elephants walking into the Capitol in Washington DC, with effects as convincing as any today.\u00a0 In one film he invented a solution that could graft anything onto living plants.\u00a0 A desperate farmer, overrun with vicious mice (bearing machine guns), hired Bowers to eradicate the pests.\u00a0 Bowers solved the problem by harvesting cat-tails, grafting them onto plants, at which point live cats sprout from the plants!\u00a0 This is all shown on screen in full view.\u00a0 Bowers\u2019 stop-motion happened simultaneously with Willis O\u2019Brien\u2019s work.\u00a0 While Bowers never animates dinosaurs, he meshes live action with stop motion in brilliant ways that O\u2019Brien never tried.\u00a0 O\u2019Brien and Ray Harryhausen rarely moved their camera during animation, but Bowers gleefully pulls back from a closeup to longshot, effectively animating both camera and model.\u00a0 Bowers is one of the great rediscoveries of the past twenty years, the kind of rediscovery that keeps collectors like me digging for more lost films.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Wind-VHS-Lillian-Gish\/dp\/6301976096\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331648985&amp;sr=8-2\"><em>The Wind<\/em><\/a> (1928) with Lillian Gish.\u00a0 Swedish director Victor Seastrom (aka Sj\u00f6strom) was a great innovator in silent cinema who returned to his native land and eventually acted in Bergman films.\u00a0 This one is one of his best and most effective.\u00a0 Again, it\u2019s simple.\u00a0 Gish is an innocent young woman stuck in a small shack in the desert.\u00a0 She\u2019s been stuck with crass, unfeeling relatives in a hot, desolate landscape.\u00a0 Her isolation is something we can feel intensely, and we can understand her starting to go slightly mad in the environment.\u00a0 In self-defense, she kills a man who was making improper advances, then buries him.\u00a0 A wild windstorm ensues, blowing up the dry sand all around the shack.\u00a0 The man is uncovered and flails around outside at the windows.\u00a0 Is he really dead?\u00a0 Gish has to deal with a range of emotions and a terrifying situation.\u00a0 It\u2019s a brilliant film, not screened enough.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/TCM-Archives-Chaney-Collection-Unknown\/dp\/B0000B1O9L\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331649033&amp;sr=1-1\"><em>The Unknown<\/em><\/a> (1927) with Lon Chaney.\u00a0 This is a film that doesn\u2019t lend itself to description.\u00a0 I love running it for audiences, because it starts off a bit silly, drawing titters, and then moves into territory that has people cringing by the last reel.\u00a0 Director Tod Browning\u00a0 has been roundly trashed in popular criticism in the last decade or so.\u00a0 Well, whether like <em>Dracula <\/em>or not, this is a great film.\u00a0 Chaney plays an armless circus performer who throws knives with his feet, at lovely young Joan Crawford.\u00a0 Unbeknownst to almost everyone, Chaney actually has arms, using them to steal and murder after hours.\u00a0 Alas, Crawford sees his form, identifying his unusual double thumb, as he commits a murder.\u00a0 Chaney has a brilliant idea: he bribes a doctor to remove his arms, thereby making certain that he can never be identified for his crime.\u00a0 Chaney\u2019s performance in some of the later scenes is remarkable.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Kid\/dp\/B000P2A5VM\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331649062&amp;sr=1-1\"><em>The Kid<\/em><\/a> (1921) with Charlie Chaplin.\u00a0 I have to include a Chaplin film, and everyone is going to tell you to see <em>City Lights <\/em>or <em>The Gold Rush<\/em>.\u00a0 Those may be more important films, but <em>The Kid <\/em>is very accessible, very well acted, and filmically very important: it was the first major comedy feature picture.\u00a0 Certainly<em>, Tillie\u2019s Punctured Romance <\/em>(1914) is also a feature (just squeaking by the time requirement), but <em>The Kid <\/em>is far more advanced structurally.\u00a0 It paved the way for comedies and comedy-dramas for years to come.\u00a0 Jackie Coogan is a wonderful child performer, and Chaplin exploits him perfectly.\u00a0 Chaplin\u2019s mastery of both film direction and geography meshed with his sensitive portrayal combines to make this a great film.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Patsy-Marion-Davies\/dp\/B002XDR5QY\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331654107&amp;sr=8-2\"><em>The Patsy<\/em><\/a> (1928).\u00a0 Marion Davies is one of the most maligned talents in cinema.\u00a0 <em>Citizen Kane <\/em>unfairly portrayed her as a talentless hack, something that Orson Welles regretted in interviews for years.\u00a0 Her long-time lover, William Randolph Hearst, often threw Davies in costume dramas, a genre for which she was ill-suited.\u00a0 When left to her own devices, Davies was an ace comedienne, able to make a charming performance from even the frothiest script.\u00a0 In this film, as the forgotten \u201cgood girl\u201d in the family, Davies loses all the cute men to her sister.\u00a0 Thinking she needs a better personality, Davies impersonates Pola Negri, Lillian Gish, and Mae Murray.\u00a0 (Don\u2019t worry, it\u2019s funny even if you don\u2019t know the people she\u2019s imitating).\u00a0 Davies is a delight to watch in her attempts to win the favor of a young man\u2013 a man also being pursued by her sister.\u00a0 Throw in sterling work by Marie Dressler as the mother, and this is a howl from start to finish.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Destiny-Lil-Dagover\/dp\/B00004Z4VE\/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331649097&amp;sr=1-1\"><em>Destiny<\/em><\/a> (1921).\u00a0 I know the pundits are going to say Murnau, Murnau, Murnau!\u00a0 To you I say, Lang, Lang, Lang!\u00a0 Murnau is more pretentious and arty than Lang, and Lang,\u00a0 (when he\u2019s not being long-winded and preachy), is more accessible.\u00a0 This, to me, is his best film.\u00a0 A young woman, Lil Dagover (also the female lead in <em>Cabinet of Dr. Caligari<\/em>) is distressed when her lover leaves with a stranger and does not return.\u00a0 The stranger is Death, and his garden wall is impenetrable.\u00a0 Eventually, Death agrees to a challenge: if she can defeat him and save just one of three men from his fate, then Death will reunite the lovers.\u00a0 This concept has been ripped off a zillion times, from <em>The Seventh Seal <\/em>to <em>Bill and Ted\u2019s Bogus Journey.\u00a0 <\/em>Sadly, the surviving prints of this film aren\u2019t the greatest, so I\u2019m a little hesitant to recommend it on that level, but I hope viewers will find its simple story so compelling that it overcomes the deterioration of poor copying.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I know that I\u2019m going to get brickbats hurled at me because of these choices.\u00a0 What?\u00a0 No Harold Lloyd?\u00a0 No DW Griffith?\u00a0 No deMille?\u00a0 No Arbuckle?\u00a0 No Ince?\u00a0 No William Desmond Taylor?\u00a0 No Louise Brooks?\u00a0 No Colleen Moore?\u00a0 No Valentino?\u00a0 No <em>Napoleon<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>Well, this is the problem with lists.\u00a0 You note that I produced more than ten examples of people omitted from this silly list.\u00a0 I hope that these films will pique your interest and challenge you to watch more silent films.\u00a0 I hope it will encourage you to patronize some of the revival theaters and film conventions that trot out many rare films that can only be seen on the big screen.<\/p>\n<p>(And OK, you made it this far. \u00a0The holy quintet of classic films are as follows:\u00a0 <em>Casablanca, Citizen Kane, The Wizard of Oz, Singin\u2019 in the Rain, <\/em>and <em>Gone With the Wind<\/em>.\u00a0 I actually had a theater manager tell me that he\u2019d just like to have a theater running a different one of those five films every week because they\u2019d all do good business.\u00a0 So much for challenging your audience a little!)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that The Artist has won the Best Picture Oscar, I\u2019ve been asked by numerous people to recommend other silent films.\u00a0 People treat me as if I speak a foreign language and that perhaps I can teach them the secret to unlocking it.\u00a0 In a way, this is really true, because silent film uses a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/?p=198\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Dude, #youSawTheArtist&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"powered_cache_disable_cache":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[207,4],"tags":[82,81,80,71],"class_list":["post-198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film","category-views-and-reviews","tag-film-history","tag-recommendations","tag-silent-film","tag-the-artist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=198"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1929,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions\/1929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.drfilm.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}